The Ethereum network, once hailed as the backbone of decentralized innovation and second only to Bitcoin in market dominance, is facing growing scrutiny. After years of anticipation and technical upgrades, Ethereum’s transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) in 2022 was meant to mark a new era of scalability, sustainability, and efficiency. However, recent performance tells a different story — one of declining investor interest, weakening price momentum, and rising concerns over centralization.
Since early 2024, Ethereum (ETH) has seen a steady decline, dropping below $3,000 in February, then $2,000 in March, and even touching lows under $1,500 in April. This downward spiral marks a stark contrast to its all-time high of $4,891 in 2021. While macroeconomic factors play a role, on-chain data suggests that Ethereum’s shift to PoS may have inadvertently weakened its long-term appeal.
The Turning Point: Ethereum’s Move to Proof-of-Stake
According to blockchain analyst Murphy, the turning point for ETH coincided with its transition to PoS at the end of 2022. On-chain metrics, particularly token flow and value ratios, indicate a structural shift in how capital interacts with the network. Prior to late 2022, Ethereum maintained strong exchange inflows and outflows — a sign of active trading and market engagement.
However, by December 2022, ETH’s share of exchange trading volume had dropped below 35%, down from over 50% in September 2021. This decline signals reduced liquidity concentration and waning trader interest compared to Bitcoin and other emerging ecosystems. The data suggests that capital is no longer rotating through ETH at the same pace, indicating a loss of momentum.
Centralization Concerns Shake Confidence
One of the most persistent criticisms following the Merge is Ethereum’s increasing centralization risk. Prominent crypto analyst PlanB recently labeled Ethereum a “centralized, pre-mined project” on X (formerly Twitter), arguing that its switch to PoS and flexible supply mechanisms undermine its credibility as a decentralized asset.
These concerns are not baseless. In January 2025, Vitalik Buterin confirmed that he still holds final decision-making authority over the Ethereum Foundation (EF), despite ongoing efforts to establish a formal board. While intended as a temporary measure, this revelation sparked renewed debate about whether Ethereum truly operates in a decentralized manner — especially when key upgrades and governance decisions remain concentrated in a small group.
Decentralization isn’t just philosophical; it affects trust. Investors increasingly favor networks where power is distributed across validators, developers, and users — not controlled by a few influential figures or entities.
Layer 2 Proliferation: Innovation or Value Leak?
Another critical factor contributing to Ethereum’s stagnation is the rise of Layer 2 (L2) scaling solutions. Projects like Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync, StarkNet, Mantle, Base, Blast, Scroll, Linea, and Polygon zkEVM were designed to offload congestion from Ethereum’s mainnet while preserving security. But their success has come at a cost.
Instead of reinforcing Ethereum’s value proposition, many L2s are now competing directly with it. They offer faster transactions, lower fees, and increasingly independent ecosystems — often capturing revenue that would otherwise go to Ethereum miners (pre-Merge) or stakers (post-Merge).
For example, Base — an L2 developed by Coinbase — has rapidly gained traction. A recent report titled “Ethereum’s Midlife Crisis” by Standard Chartered estimated that Base alone may have contributed to a $50 billion erosion in Ethereum’s market value by diverting transaction volume and economic activity away from Layer 1.
Geoffrey Kendrick, Global Head of Digital Asset Research at Standard Chartered, noted:
“Unless there’s a mechanism to capture excess profits from dominant L2s — such as through taxation or shared revenue models — Ethereum’s relative performance against Bitcoin will continue to deteriorate.”
This phenomenon isn’t unique to Base. As more L2s grow their Total Value Locked (TVL) and build standalone dApp ecosystems, they risk becoming parasitic rather than symbiotic — extracting value without sufficiently reinvesting it into Ethereum’s core economy.
Could PoW Have Preserved Value?
Some analysts argue that maintaining PoW could have sustained stronger price support for ETH. Under PoW, miners invest heavily in hardware and electricity to secure the network — creating continuous demand for ETH as payment for block rewards and operational costs.
Even if Layer 2 development lagged under PoW, the constant capital outflow into mining infrastructure would have provided structural demand for ETH. Today, under PoS, much of that demand has disappeared. Staking requires only holding and locking tokens — a passive activity that doesn’t drive active spending or investment cycles.
In contrast, Bitcoin’s enduring strength lies partly in its unwavering commitment to PoW and predictable issuance. Its scarcity model remains unchallenged, making it a preferred store of value amid uncertainty.
Still Hope for Ethereum?
Despite these challenges, not all outlooks are bearish. Matt Hougan, CIO at Bitwise, remains optimistic about Ethereum’s long-term role in shaping the future of digital assets. He points to three dominant trends where Ethereum continues to lead:
- Stablecoins: Most major stablecoins (like USDC and DAI) are issued on Ethereum or its L2s.
- Tokenization: Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization projects frequently choose Ethereum due to its security and developer ecosystem.
- AI Agents: Emerging AI-driven decentralized applications are being built primarily on Ethereum-compatible chains.
Hougan believes that if Ethereum can improve user experience via Layer 2 adoption without sacrificing institutional trust, it can reclaim its leadership position.
👉 See how next-gen blockchain applications are evolving on leading platforms today.
Core Keywords
- Ethereum analysis
- Proof-of-Stake transition
- Layer 2 impact on Ethereum
- ETH price decline
- Blockchain decentralization
- On-chain data trends
- Crypto investor sentiment
- Ethereum vs Bitcoin
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why did Ethereum switch from PoW to PoS?
A: Ethereum moved to PoS primarily to improve energy efficiency, reduce environmental impact, increase scalability through future upgrades like sharding, and enhance network security by aligning validator incentives with long-term ecosystem health.
Q: Did the Merge cause ETH’s price drop?
A: While no single event fully explains ETH’s price movement, the timing aligns closely with reduced exchange flows and weaker investor momentum post-Merge. Structural changes in supply dynamics and staking behavior likely contributed to diminished trading activity.
Q: Are Layer 2 networks bad for Ethereum?
A: Not inherently. L2s solve urgent scalability issues. However, if they capture most transaction fees and dApp innovation without contributing back to Ethereum’s treasury or value accrual mechanisms, they risk weakening the parent chain’s economic foundation.
Q: Is Ethereum more centralized than Bitcoin?
A: Many experts believe so. Bitcoin’s mining distribution and conservative upgrade process promote decentralization. In contrast, Ethereum’s governance relies more on core developers and foundation leadership — raising concerns about decision-making concentration.
Q: Can Ethereum recover its market position?
A: Yes — but it depends on restoring confidence in decentralization, capturing value from L2 ecosystems, and continuing innovation in areas like tokenized assets and AI-integrated smart contracts.
Q: What should ETH investors watch for in 2025?
A: Key indicators include EIP proposals related to fee-sharing with L2s, growth in institutional-grade dApps on L1/L2, staking concentration levels, and any regulatory clarity around staked ETH as a financial instrument.
While Ethereum remains a foundational pillar of the blockchain ecosystem, its journey post-PoS demands reinvention. To regain investor trust and competitive edge, it must address centralization concerns, rebalance value distribution across layers, and reaffirm its role as the premier platform for open innovation.
👉 Stay ahead of market shifts with real-time data and insights from a trusted global platform.