Understanding FOK and FAK Orders in Futures Trading

·

Futures trading offers a wide array of tools and order types that empower traders to execute strategies with precision. Among these, FOK (Fill or Kill) and FAK (Fill and Kill, but partial fill allowed) stand out as essential time-in-force instructions used to manage trade execution under specific market conditions. These order types are particularly valuable in fast-moving or low-liquidity environments where timing and control over execution are critical.

This article dives deep into what FOK and FAK orders are, how they function, their key differences, and the practical scenarios in which each should be applied. Whether you're a beginner learning the ropes or an experienced trader refining your strategy, understanding these order types can significantly improve your trading efficiency and risk management.

What Is a FOK (Fill or Kill) Order?

A Fill or Kill (FOK) order is an instruction that requires the entire quantity of a trade to be executed immediately upon submission — otherwise, the entire order is canceled. There is no room for partial fills.

Key Characteristics of FOK Orders

👉 Discover how advanced order types like FOK can enhance your trading precision

For example, if a trader places a FOK buy order for 100 contracts at $50 each, the system will only execute the trade if 100 contracts are available at that price right away. If only 70 are available, none will be bought — the order vanishes instantly.

This makes FOK orders best suited for markets with high liquidity and when traders need certainty about position size upon entry or exit.

What Is a FAK (Fill and Kill) Order?

Unlike FOK, a Fill and Kill (FAK) order allows partial execution. When placed, the system immediately fills as much of the order as possible at the specified price, then cancels any unfilled portion.

Key Features of FAK Orders

For instance, a sell order of 100 contracts using FAK might result in 60 contracts being filled instantly at the target price, while the remaining 40 are canceled. This avoids leaving a lingering order that might later execute at a less favorable price due to market movement.

Comparing FOK vs FAK: When to Use Which?

FeatureFOK OrderFAK Order
Full Fill Required✅ Yes❌ No
Partial Fill Allowed❌ No✅ Yes
Speed of ExecutionImmediateImmediate
Best ForHigh-precision trades, large blocksFast execution with flexibility
Risk of Non-ExecutionHigher (especially in low liquidity)Lower (partial fill accepted)

While both orders emphasize immediacy, FOK prioritizes completeness, whereas FAK prioritizes actionability. Choosing between them depends on your trading goals:

Exchange-Specific Rules for FOK and FAK Orders

Different exchanges in China have varying policies regarding the use of these advanced order types:

Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE)

China Financial Futures Exchange (CFFEX)

Dalian Commodity Exchange (DCE)

These rules reflect a broader trend toward giving professional traders more granular control over execution quality — especially important in algorithmic and high-frequency trading environments.

👉 Learn how top traders leverage FAK and FOK orders for optimal execution

Practical Applications in Real Trading Scenarios

Let’s explore two real-world examples:

Scenario 1: Using FOK in Low-Liquidity Conditions

A hedge fund wants to short 500 contracts of a less-traded metal futures contract. To avoid distorting the market or accumulating unintended exposure, they use a FOK order at a specific price. Since liquidity is thin, the full 500-lot order doesn’t fill — so it gets canceled. This prevents an unbalanced position and allows the trader to reassess timing without accidental execution.

Scenario 2: Using FAK During News Volatility

Ahead of an economic data release, a trader sets a FAK buy order for crude oil futures. As prices gap up on news, only half the order fills instantly at the desired level — the rest is canceled. Although not fully executed, the trader gains partial exposure at a known price, avoiding slippage on the remainder.

These cases highlight how proper use of time-based orders enhances discipline and reduces emotional decision-making.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can I use FOK or FAK with market orders?
A: It depends on the exchange. On DCE, yes — both market and limit orders support these attributes. On SHFE and CFFEX, they’re generally limited to limit orders only.

Q: Are FOK and FAK available during pre-market or closing auctions?
A: No. Most exchanges prohibit these orders during auction periods due to price discovery mechanics. They’re typically restricted to continuous trading hours.

Q: Do retail traders benefit from using FOK/FAK?
A: Absolutely. While often associated with institutional use, retail traders dealing in fast markets (like energy or grains) can reduce slippage and gain better control using these tools.

Q: Is there a risk of missing opportunities with FOK?
A: Yes — because FOK demands full execution, it carries a higher chance of non-fill, especially in illiquid contracts. Traders should assess liquidity before relying on this type.

Q: How do I set FOK or FAK on my trading platform?
A: Look for "Time in Force" or "Order Type" options when placing a limit order. Selecting “FOK” or “FAK” will apply the respective behavior — consult your broker’s interface for exact labels.

Final Thoughts: Mastering Execution for Better Results

Understanding FOK and FAK orders isn’t just about knowing definitions — it’s about applying them strategically. In modern futures trading, execution quality directly impacts profitability. By choosing the right order type for the right situation, traders protect themselves from unintended risk, avoid poor fills, and maintain tighter control over their strategies.

Whether you're navigating high-frequency environments or managing large positions, incorporating FOK and FAK into your toolkit can make a measurable difference in performance.

👉 Start applying smart order strategies today — explore powerful trading tools now


Core Keywords: futures trading, FOK order, FAK order, order types, trade execution, liquidity management, risk control, limit order