Weiss Ratings Releases Full List of 93 Cryptocurrency Grades

·

Cryptocurrency investors seeking independent, data-driven insights now have access to a comprehensive evaluation of 93 digital assets from Weiss Ratings, one of the most respected financial rating agencies in the U.S. With Bitcoin upgraded to a B- and Ethereum among 14 cryptocurrencies earning a "B" grade, this latest report offers valuable clarity in an often volatile and opaque market.

Weiss Ratings, established in 1971, has built a decades-long reputation for objective analysis across traditional finance—covering stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, banks, and insurance companies. In early 2025, the firm extended its rigorous methodology to the blockchain space with the launch of Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings, applying advanced analytics to thousands of data points across technology, adoption, and market performance.

👉 Discover how top-rated cryptocurrencies are shaping the future of decentralized finance.

Understanding the Weiss Cryptocurrency Rating System

Weiss employs a letter-grade system similar to academic scoring:

Plus (+) and minus (–) modifiers indicate performance within the upper or lower third of each grade range. Notably, no cryptocurrency received an A or B+ in this assessment, underscoring the high bar Weiss sets for excellence.

Importantly, Weiss emphasizes that a B or even B– rating can represent a “buy” signal for investors. These grades reflect strong fundamentals despite existing challenges. Meanwhile, C-grade assets are not automatically dismissed—they’re considered “passing” investments that may offer value with higher risk tolerance.

Top Performers: The B-Tier Cryptocurrencies

Fourteen cryptocurrencies earned a B or B– rating, signaling solid performance across Weiss’s proprietary metrics.

ADA (Cardano), DCR (Decred), EOS – Rated B

These platforms scored highly for technological innovation, network security, and long-term sustainability. Cardano’s peer-reviewed development approach and Decred’s hybrid consensus model contributed to their strong standing.

Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), IOTA (MIOTA), NEO, XRP, STEEM, TRON (TRX), Stellar (XLM), Ontology (ONT), Zilliqa (ZIL), BitShares (BTS) – Rated B–

Bitcoin’s upgrade to B– marks a significant shift from its previous C+ rating. Weiss cited Bitcoin’s unmatched security and widespread adoption but noted persistent issues like network congestion and high transaction fees. While efforts like the Lightning Network show promise, Bitcoin lacks a formal governance mechanism for rapid software upgrades.

Ethereum maintained its B– status thanks to robust developer activity and smart contract leadership, though scalability remains a concern ahead of full Ethereum 2.0 rollout.

Mid-Tier Assets: The C-Grade Landscape

Fifty-four cryptocurrencies received C, C+, or C– ratings—what Weiss defines as "fair" or "average" performance. These assets often show potential but face challenges in adoption, decentralization, or technical execution.

Notable C-tier coins include:

While these projects maintain active communities and functional blockchains, they generally lag behind leaders in innovation velocity or real-world utility. For example, Litecoin’s role as “digital silver” hasn’t translated into broad payment adoption, while privacy coins like Monero and Zcash face regulatory scrutiny despite strong tech foundations.

👉 Explore how emerging blockchain platforms are redefining digital value transfer.

Why No A or F Ratings?

The absence of A-rated cryptocurrencies reflects Weiss’s conservative standards. To earn an A, a digital asset must demonstrate:

No current project meets all criteria at the highest level. Similarly, no coin received an F—indicating that while many face hurdles, none were flagged for outright failure or fraud in this evaluation.

Methodology Behind the Grades

Weiss analyzes each cryptocurrency using a multi-dimensional framework:

  1. Technology Score: Evaluates consensus mechanism, transaction speed, scalability solutions, code quality, and upgrade frequency.
  2. Adoption Score: Measures wallet growth, transaction volume, merchant acceptance, developer engagement, and exchange listings.
  3. Market Performance: Assesses volatility, liquidity, price stability relative to peers, and resistance to manipulation.

By combining these factors algorithmically—and updating them weekly—Weiss aims to provide dynamic, forward-looking insights rather than static snapshots.

FAQ: Common Questions About Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings

Q: Is a B– rating good for Bitcoin?
A: Yes. Given Bitcoin’s foundational role and inherent design trade-offs (e.g., prioritizing security over speed), a B– is a strong result. It suggests resilience and long-term viability despite short-term inefficiencies.

Q: Why didn’t Ethereum get a higher grade?
A: While Ethereum leads in dApp and DeFi ecosystems, its current proof-of-work model limits throughput and increases fees during peak usage. The transition to proof-of-stake is expected to improve its score over time.

Q: Can I trust Weiss Ratings?
A: Weiss has over 50 years of experience in financial risk assessment. Their crypto ratings are transparently sourced and updated frequently, making them a reliable resource—though not a substitute for personal research.

Q: What does a C+ mean for investment decisions?
A: A C+ indicates average performance. These assets may be speculative but could grow if key upgrades succeed or market conditions shift favorably.

Q: Are ratings updated regularly?
A: Yes. Unlike one-time analyses, Weiss refreshes its scores weekly based on new data, ensuring relevance in fast-moving markets.

Q: How does Weiss avoid bias?
A: The firm does not accept payments from projects for ratings and uses automated models to minimize human subjectivity.

👉 Stay ahead with real-time insights from leading blockchain analytics platforms.

Final Thoughts: Using Ratings to Inform Strategy

Weiss Ratings doesn’t claim to predict prices—but it does help investors distinguish signal from noise. With 93 cryptocurrencies now graded objectively, users can compare projects across technical merit, adoption trends, and market health.

For long-term investors, focusing on B-tier assets offers a balanced approach: exposure to innovation without excessive risk. Meanwhile, monitoring C-tier projects can uncover under-the-radar opportunities if they execute roadmap milestones successfully.

As the digital asset ecosystem matures, independent evaluations like Weiss’s will play an increasingly critical role in guiding capital allocation and fostering trust in decentralized technologies.

Whether you're assessing Bitcoin’s evolution or exploring altcoin potential, understanding these ratings empowers smarter decision-making in the complex world of crypto finance.